Call of Duty removing maps due to their similarity with real life places?

Modern Warfare 2 (2022) just released a few weeks ago. Many players are upset that a map (and supposedly another is about to be removed for similar reasons) in the multiplayer was removed due to legal issues. For reference, a map is the virtual battleground that multiplayer matches are played on, typically the game has a dozen or more of them.  GameRant reports that the map may have been removed due to its “similarity to the Getty Museum in Los Angeles” and that the developers did not have permission to use its likeness (see: https://gamerant.com/call-of-duty-modern-warfare-2-valderas-museum-return-demand/). GameRant also notes that this is not the first time the developer has gotten slack for using “real life” environments (see: https://gamerant.com/call-of-duty-modern-warfare-2-valderas-museum-return-demand/).

(image sourced from: https://gamerant.com/call-of-duty-modern-warfare-2-valderas-museum-return-demand/)

This is clearly an intellectual property issue and goes right back to our earlier discussions of meta-verses recreating life. Do you think the Getty Museum has a strong claim? The developers undoubtedly spent hours designing the map, should they have any recourse? As discussed, there are rumours that another map is going to be removed, likely for similar issues. This is quite upsetting as the game did not release with many maps and we will not have a content update for another few weeks.