Again this past April I was honoured to participate in my wonderful colleague, Professor Gaetano Dimita’s outstanding annual international “More Than Just a Game” conference, in London, U.K. The conference was fittingly put on at historic Stationers’ Hall by the Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary University of London, aided and abetted by a group of excellent and generous sponsors. My talk focussed on when and how the law could intervene when virtual reality becomes so convincing that our freedom of thought becomes compromised.
Above is a video of my talk, then the slides related to it and finally a link to video of all of the panels at the conference.
Here’s to the 2018 edition of “More Than Just a Game”, and to many more thereafter….
Am very excited to be starting the 10th edition of Video Game Law at the Allard School of Law. It a bit mind boggling to reflect back on nine other classes and all the special moments, and most significantly all the truly amazing students I am so lucky have had an interest in the subject. Nostalgia and warm feelings aside, what all that history really does is make me look forward to this iteration and this group.
The first version of Video Game law as a full course (as opposed to a unit or two in the Media, Entertainment and Communications Law course I gave) was in the Fall semester of 2006. To add some perspective, the first iPhone was introduced almost ten months later on June 29, 2007. The iPhone and the smartphone revolution it spearheaded transformed video-gaming, eventually changing it’s demographics, business models and even how we think of controllers. Probably more than anything else the smartphone ushered in a world in which video-games have become a true mass medium with gross financial numbers exceeding other forms of entertainment. Yet, it’s worth remembering that playing games on a handheld device was not something Steve Jobs invented. That distinction goes to Atari’s Lynx in 1989…..yes, 1989. And the Nokia N-Gage, a device that seamlessly combined cellular telephony and mobile gaming was released over four and a half years before the iPhone was even introduced. A picture of my second generation N-Gage is at the top of this post.
So what might our take-aways be? Let me suggest a few. Feel free to add others or push back.
Things change fast in video-games, when they change. And the revolutionary changes seem to always be about how we interact, with the device, the game or other gamers.
Game devices are often ahead of the curve, but don’t always capture the market they envision. The N-Gage is one example. The X-Box One which tried to be a gaming device that became your central entertainment hub through which you would connect even to your television… for all intents and purposes just stayed a video game device.
Innovations come and go, but the essentials of playing games remain. The saying goes “don’t put the cart before the horse”. Games are the horse. Whatever we dress the experience up with, if the game is not fun and engaging that’s precisely where it runs out of steam. Augmented Reality has had it’s breakthrough (Pokemon Go) while Virtual Reality is still searching for its killer game that everyone has to play, even though the technology itself delivers an amazing “experience”.
So what does all that have to do with law? One word: Interactivity. The legal issues that make Video Game Law not “Law of the Horse” are to be found in the transformative nature of interactivity and the blurring of lines between creators and players, between device and tool.
Welcome to the next chapter in the journey Cohort 10. I am very happy that you are here.
Check out theVideos of Interest to Law 423 on YouTube 
Communications Law
Join the Community!